Current:Home > reviewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -GrowthInsight
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-18 04:15:46
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (285)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Anna Delvey Sums Up Her Dancing With the Stars Experience With Just One Word
- Aaron Hernandez ‘American Sports Story’ series wants to show a different view of the disgraced NFLer
- Cal State campuses brace for ‘severe consequences’ as budget gap looms
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Steelworkers lose arbitration case against US Steel in their bid to derail sale to Nippon
- Maryland Gov. Wes Moore welcomes King Abdullah II of Jordan to state Capitol
- The Latest: Candidates will try to counter criticisms of them in dueling speeches
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Rapper Fatman Scoop's cause of death revealed a month after death: Reports
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Resentencing for Lee Malvo postponed in Maryland after Virginia says he can’t attend in person
- Campeones Cup final live updates: Columbus Crew vs. Club América winner, how to stream
- Kenny G says Whitney Houston was 'amazing', recalls their shared history in memoir
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Video captures Brittany Furlan jump into rescue mode after coyote snatches dog from backyard
- OpenAI exec Mira Murati says she’s leaving artificial intelligence company
- Takeaways from an AP and Texas Tribune report on 24 hours along the US-Mexico border
Recommendation
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Women’s only track meet in NYC features Olympic champs, musicians and lucrative prize money
New 'Wuthering Heights' film casting sparks backlash, accusations of whitewashing
Wisconsin mayor carts away absentee ballot drop box, says he did nothing wrong
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
X releases its first transparency report since Elon Musk’s takeover
Who is Matt Sluka? UNLV QB redshirting remainder of season amid reported NIL dispute
Milwaukee-area stolen Virgin Mary statue found and returned to church